On Digital Disruption

I believe in digital disruption and I do believe there is a lot that will change, but who am I telling that to my readers. I rarely blog about a blog but now Simon Waldman started a new one entitled: “Digital Disruption” and it’s a great read, especially because it is from inside the fense. Simon is Director of Digital Strategy and Development at the Guardian Media Group.

Just read The Outsider Solution, or post on the NYT. Having met Simon some time ago I can only suggest reading the blog. He does get it as they say, and not only from a “let’s go all digital” point of view but from a real understanding of the newspaper business, with lots of discussions with all involved.

Disqus is now THE comment system for blogs

There you go, I said it. I had some holdbacks for Disqus but with the latest release it is really amazing. First of all, the comments are nice and threaded and you have one login over all of your comments on all blogs. There were some things that were still bad but they were just fixed:

  • Your blogs comments are now included via an API in a SEO friendly manner and not via JavaScript.
  • The comments are synced back to your wordpress installation so you are not loosing anything and can always switch back.
  • You can import in your old comments … theoretically, failed for me up till now but let’s give them some time. You can set it to only be the commenting system on commentless posts and new ones.
  • You can moderate via your wordpress admin.

Well I am sold. Disqus is running and I am happy. Check out more reporting at Techcrunch, A VC, and the Inquisitr. Have fun trying out Disqus.

Online Advertising gets a new name: Google

We all know Google is big, but today a few things popped up that should be shaking the media industry in its very foundation. Sadly, I doubt that will happen, partly because the media industry is profit focussed and partly because it does not really know what its core competence is.

Jason Calacanis recently sent out an email in relation to Google starting Knol entitled “Is Google a content company?” This included one nice list:

Let’s run a test: what is the role of a content publisher?

1. Secure talent
2. Distribute their work
3. Monetize that work
4. Pay the content creator for their work
5. Build a library of that work for future monetization

If we can roughly agree that this is correct, then Google is a content company, at least with Knol, but possibly even because of the simple fact that many blogs are using AdSense. And if you look at some bigger publisher you are somebody wondering if Google didn’t secure their talent in an AdSense deal, is distributing their work via Google, monetizing it via AdSense, paying them a share and indexing the work for future monetization.

So all in all, Google is becoming a publisher.

Obviously, next up is advertising, the monetization part. Google came to the monetization of search via text links by accident and largely copied Overture. And now with Knol, they are trying to monetize more of the second clicks, which is actually similar in AdSense. If people don’t click on an AdSense link right away, then let them do it in the second click. Of course it was all performance driven but that let out the branding part of the business.

Then Google bought Doubleclick and boy is the strategy amazing. Their Adsense covers the smaller 100k visitors sites and Doubleclick covers the rest. Just check this Attributor post. It’s scary.

Today Google announced a few new additions to their content network … like Frequency Capping, which Plentyoffish is all happy about, understandably so, and argues that it will make Google dominate display ads. I personally think the last two points are the scary ones:

  • Improved Ads Quality: Brings performance improvements within the Google content network.
  • View-Through Conversions: Enables advertisers to gain insights on how many users visited their sites after seeing an ad. This helps advertisers determine the best places to advertise so users will see more relevant ads.

As a short background, what Google now does is serve a Doubleclick Cookie with each AdSense ad request, effectively creating one big cookie/profiling network over all Doubleclick and AdSense instances. But what are Doubleclick instances? Those are actually way more than the publisher installations DFP (Dart for Publishers) but also DFA (Dart for Advertisers). So an Agency like Pilot might run a DFA instance and use it to track AdImpressions of bookings they had, clicks as well as conversions. And this is where the scary part is. Those agencies will be able to (with a few twists) book directly into any AdSense placement that has image ads enabled. And they have a cookie about the user that clicks through having booked an Ad on a big publisher. Run a Frequency Capping campaign on a few of the biggest publishers out there where the audience is that you believe to want to attract, cookieing the user, then targeting them on AdSense. This model might still be a few days out but this is where this is going. At least, I have not heard yet that there will be no cookie sharing from DFA and DFP instances.

And on the other side, there are a lot of players out there that generate leads through Google’s clicks. This is a huge market, I know, and you know what… Google is going there too. Check out Google Merchant Search Beta, where Google is generating leads (possibly even sales, because they don’t say how the billing works) for credit institutes. Damn god.

Google is simply using their vast data pool to take a look at what to launch next. By now they are becoming a publisher, pushing further into advertising in both directions (clicks to leads and clicks to branding) and using their vast data pool to become more of the web. Bummer.

I see that many people out there do not want Google to become online Advertising but I am not sure if their “don’t want to” is linked to some strategy that is filtered through to the profit centers having no option but to use Google.